Armed Conflicts

Our Objective

Support the development of peace-supporting policies and broaden public understanding of conflict by:

  • tracking the development, resolution and impact of armed conflict worldwide;
  • compiling research into a comprehensive and coherent report, called the Armed Conflicts Report, distributed in Canada and abroad.

Armed Conflicts Report

The Armed Conflicts Report consists of two major components, both updated annually.

  1. A compilation of detailed descriptions of each conflict available exclusively on our website, updated annually.
  2. poster printed for distribution to donors, at various conferences and events and in response to requests.

Conflict Descriptions

Please be advised that our ACR Country Reports are currently under construction, so if the pages look a little wonky to you, it’s not your computer – it’s us! Thank you.

You can also access the Armed Conflict Reports on the Publications search page and through the interactive Armed Conflicts Report Map.

How to read the ACR Conflict Descriptions

If you have minimal knowledge about a conflict, the Conflict Description will be easier to follow if you begin by reading the background section first, followed by the parties to the conflict section and then the summary.

Defining Armed Conflict

For the purposes of the annual Armed Conflicts Report, Project Ploughshares defines an armed conflict as:

a political conflict in which armed combat involves the armed forces of at least one state (or one or more armed factions seeking to gain control of all or part of the state), and in which at least 1,000 people have been killed by the fighting during the course of the conflict.

An armed conflict is added to the annual list of current armed conflicts in the year in which the death toll reaches the threshold of 1,000, but the starting date of the armed conflict is shown as the year in which the first combat deaths included in the count of 1,000 or more occurred.



The definition of “political conflict” becomes more difficult as the trend in current intrastate armed conflicts increasingly obscures the distinction between political and criminal violence.

In a growing number of armed conflicts, armed bands, militia or factions engage in criminal activity (e.g., theft, looting, extortion) in order to fund their political/military campaigns, but frequently also for the personal enrichment of the leadership and the general livelihood of the fighting forces.

Thus, in some circumstances, while the disintegrating order reflects the social chaos borne of state failure, the resulting violence or armed combat are not necessarily guided by a

political program or a set of politically motivated or defined military objectives.

However, these trends are part of the changing character of war, and conflicts characterized more by social chaos than political/military competition are thus included in the tabulation of current armed conflicts.

In many contemporary armed conflicts the fighting is intermittent and involves a very wide range of levels of intensity.


An armed conflict is deemed to have ended if:

  • there has been a formal ceasefire or peace agreement and, following which, there are no longer combat deaths (or at least fewer than 25 per year); or
  • in the absence of a formal ceasefire, a conflict is deemed to have ended after two years of dormancy (in which fewer than 25 combat deaths per year have occurred).

The above definition builds upon, but differs in some aspects from, the definitions of other groups producing annual conflict tabulations, notably reports by Peter Wallensteen and Margareta Sollenberg of the Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University (Sweden), published annually in the yearbook of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

photos: Siegfried Modola/IRIN (top and bottom image); Martine Perret/UN

Spread the Word